Marketable Title

Legal information, not legal advice. Verify against the cited primary sources before acting. Title, deed-delivery, and curative law varies by jurisdiction and is frequently amended. Last verified: 2026-06-08.

  • What it is: Marketable title is title a reasonable, well-informed buyer would accept and pay fair value for, and that a court would compel an unwilling buyer to take — i.e., title free of reasonable doubt as to its validity, free of undisclosed liens and encumbrances, and not exposed to the hazard of litigation. It is the title quality a seller of land must be able and ready to convey when performance comes due. In a contract for deed (CFD) / installment land contract, the seller retains record legal title during the term as security and the buyer holds an equitable interest (equitable-conversion, equitable-title); the seller’s marketable-title obligation is therefore deferred to payoff — the moment of deed delivery — unless the contract says otherwise.

  • Why it matters for contract-for-deed: The CFD is the one financing structure where the buyer pays the entire price before receiving the deed, often over many years, while the seller keeps the record title that can be clouded in the interim by the seller’s own conduct — a judgment lien, a tax lien, a later mortgage or wrap (wrap-around-mortgage, underlying-mortgage-wrap), a divorce, a death, or the seller’s bankruptcy. The buyer who recorded the contract and faithfully paid for a decade can still arrive at payoff to find the seller cannot deliver clean title. Three questions drive every CFD title analysis: (1) when must the seller produce marketable title (almost always at payoff, not at signing); (2) how is the deed delivered and how is the buyer protected against a mid-term cloud (recording the contract or a memorandum; escrowing the executed deed; specific performance; statutory conversion rights); and (3) what title assurance the buyer can obtain (a title commitment at contracting and an owner’s policy at payoff, plus a vendee’s-interest policy during the term).

  • The default rule — marketable title is owed at the time set for conveyance, not before: Because equitable conversion makes the buyer the beneficial owner the moment the contract is enforceable while the seller holds legal title “as trustee/security” (gallicchio-v-jarzla-1952; lenman-v-jones-1911), the seller need not hold perfect title throughout the installment term. The seller’s enforceable duty is to be able to convey marketable title when the buyer performs — i.e., at payoff (or at an earlier conversion the contract or a statute permits). A seller who cannot convey marketable title at that point has breached, and the buyer’s remedies are the buyer’s ordinary land-contract remedies: specific performance of the conveyance obligation where the defect is curable, or benefit-of-the-bargain damages where it is not. donovan-v-bachstadt-1982 is the canonical statement: where a seller could not convey marketable title because of a title defect, the buyer recovers compensatory (loss-of-bargain) damages, not merely a deposit refund — the buyer is put in the position full performance would have produced. And because land is unique, courts apply a “virtual presumption … that specific performance is the buyer’s remedy for the vendor’s breach of a contract to convey” (friendship-manor-inc-v-greiman-1990); a CFD buyer can compel the deed at payoff (lyons-v-pitts-2006, bond-for-deed buyer’s specific-performance right; lenman-v-jones-1911, vendee/assignee may compel specific performance).

  • Deed delivery & escrow — the mechanism that turns equitable title into legal title: The deed is the instrument of conveyance, and in the CFD it is delivered at payoff. Two questions recur. First, what deed: several states specify by statute. Ohio commands a general warranty deed on completion (or the best deed available if the vendor is legally unable to give a general warranty deed), R.C. § 5313.02(A)(11). Texas lets the buyer convert to recorded legal title at any time without penalty and obtain a deed “containing any warranties required by the contract,” Tex. Prop. Code § 5.081. Second, escrow: parties frequently escrow the executed deed with a neutral third party (title company or attorney) for automatic delivery on final payment. Escrow protects the buyer against the worst mid-term title risks — seller death, incapacity, or insolvency — because a deed already delivered into escrow with instructions to record on payoff is generally beyond the reach of the seller’s later estate or trustee. Most states permit but do not require deed escrow (e.g., Ohio, R.C. § 5313.02 — escrow permitted, not mandated; Illinois, Florida, California, Minnesota all describe escrow as a common contractual mechanism). The contract itself must conform to deed/mortgage execution formalities where a statute so requires (Ohio, R.C. § 5313.02 — the contract “shall conform to the formalities required by law for the execution of deeds and mortgages”).

  • Curing the seller’s title defects (the operator’s pre-closing checklist): A marketable-title obligation is satisfied by delivering clean title, which in turn means curing every defect of record before the deed records. The standard curative steps, regardless of state: (a) pay off and obtain releases of every seller lien — prior mortgage/wrap (wrap-around-mortgage), mechanic’s lien, judgment lien, federal/state tax lien — out of the payoff proceeds at closing; (b) clear probate / estate clouds where the seller has died (deliver via the escrowed deed, or have the personal representative/heirs convey); (c) resolve divorce / marital-interest clouds (spousal joinder, quitclaim, or a recorded decree); (d) cure chain-of-title gaps with corrective deeds, affidavits of heirship, or a quiet-title action; and (e) run a fresh title commitment at payoff to catch liens that attached after contracting — the chief defect risk, because the seller held record title the whole term and the buyer’s protection against intervening claims is the recorded contract / memorandum (constructive notice, friendship-manor-inc-v-greiman-1990) plus priority statutes. Where the seller cannot cure, the buyer’s leverage is specific performance with an abatement, damages (donovan-v-bachstadt-1982), or — in the wrap context — the statutory anti-over-encumbrance and payment-conduit protections (wrap-around-mortgage).

  • Title-insurance availability to the CFD buyer (two policies, two moments): A CFD buyer can ordinarily obtain title insurance, and a careful buyer obtains it twice. (1) At contracting — a title commitment and, in many states, a vendee’s-interest (contract-purchaser) policy insuring the buyer’s equitable interest under the recorded contract; major underwriters and state title insurers write this coverage (e.g., Illinois — ATG, Chicago Title write contract-purchaser coverage; Ohio — land-contract vendee coverage; Florida, California, Minnesota, Texas — vendee’s-interest and/or owner’s policies available). (2) At payoff — a standard owner’s policy insuring the legal title the deed conveys. Several states statutorily advise the buyer to get an owner’s policy: Texas requires the seller’s pre-execution disclosure to instruct the buyer to “OBTAIN A TITLE ABSTRACT OR TITLE COMMITMENT … AND … PURCHASE AN OWNER’S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE COVERING THE PROPERTY” and to deliver a current survey and copies of encumbrance documents, Tex. Prop. Code § 5.069. Insurability of the equitable interest turns on the underwriter’s review and usually on the contract being recorded; the owner’s policy at payoff is conventional once the seller’s liens are released.

  • Operator takeaway: Your marketable-title obligation is deferred but enforceable — you owe clean title at payoff, and a buyer who has paid in full can compel the deed (specific performance) or recover loss-of-bargain damages if you cannot deliver (donovan-v-bachstadt-1982, lyons-v-pitts-2006). Protect the deal and yourself with the same five moves everywhere: (1) record the contract or a memorandum at signing (constructive notice freezes priority against your own later creditors); (2) escrow the executed deed for automatic delivery on payoff (defeats death/insolvency clouds); (3) keep title clean mid-term — do not encumber past the contract balance (statutorily barred in several states; see wrap-around-mortgage); (4) order a fresh title commitment at payoff and pay off/release every lien from proceeds; (5) deliver the deed the statute or contract requires (general warranty deed where commanded — Ohio § 5313.02(A)(11)) and advise the buyer to obtain an owner’s policy (mandatory advisement in Texas, § 5.069). Where a state specifies the deed, the evidence of title, or the disclosure (Ohio, Texas), compliance is what makes the deal enforceable.

▸ For Sellers / Operators — The compliance-critical facts, in order: (1) You owe marketable title at payoff, not at signing — equitable conversion lets you retain record title as security during the term, but at completion you must convey title a reasonable buyer would accept, free of liens; a buyer who has paid in full can sue for specific performance or benefit-of-the-bargain damages if you cannot deliver (donovan-v-bachstadt-1982, friendship-manor-inc-v-greiman-1990). (2) Know your state’s deed mandate. In Ohio, the contract must require a general warranty deed on completion and evidence of title per local custom, and must conform to deed/mortgage formalities (R.C. § 5313.02(A)(11), (A)(12)). In Texas, the buyer may convert to recorded legal title at any time without penalty, and you must execute the deed (or justify refusal) within 10 days of a conforming note tender (Tex. Prop. Code § 5.081), after delivering the § 5.069 disclosure (survey, encumbrance copies, owner’s-policy advisement). (3) Cure before you close. Pay off and release every lien from proceeds, clear estate/divorce/chain clouds, and run a fresh title commitment at payoff — the intervening seller lien is the classic defect that sinks delivery. (4) Escrow the deed and record the contract to immunize the buyer’s payoff right against your death, divorce, or bankruptcy and to fix priority against your later creditors. (5) Do not over-encumber the property mid-term; in several states that is statutorily barred or criminalized (see wrap-around-mortgage).

▸ For Buyers — You pay the whole price before you get the deed, so police the seller’s title the entire term: record the contract/memorandum at signing (constructive notice protects your priority — friendship-manor-inc-v-greiman-1990); insist the executed deed be escrowed for automatic delivery at payoff (so the seller’s death or bankruptcy can’t strand you); obtain a title commitment now and a vendee’s-interest policy if your state’s insurers write it, then an owner’s policy at payoff; and order a fresh title search before your final payment to catch liens the seller let attach. At payoff you are entitled to marketable title free of the seller’s liens and can compel the deed by specific performance (lyons-v-pitts-2006, lenman-v-jones-1911); if the seller cannot deliver, you may recover loss-of-bargain damages (donovan-v-bachstadt-1982).

Jurisdiction map

Positions are stated only where a retrieved primary source supports them. States not listed follow the common-law default — marketable title owed at the time set for conveyance (payoff), deed delivered then (escrow common, rarely mandatory), buyer protected by recording + specific performance — captured in the “common-law default” row by representative example; per-state §5 (Title, Recording & Wraps) modules carry the detail.

PositionJurisdiction(s)Controlling authority (primary source)
Statutory deed-at-payoff mandate — contract must require the vendor to deliver a general warranty deed on completion (or best available deed if legally unable), and to provide evidence of title per prevailing local custom; contract must conform to deed/mortgage execution formalities; deed escrow permitted, not requiredohioOhio Rev. Code § 5313.02(A)(11), (A)(12); § 5313.02 (formalities)
Statutory conversion-to-deed right + mandatory title-insurance advisement — buyer may convert to recorded legal title at any time without penalty (cash tender, or conforming note with a 10-day seller deadline to convey or justify refusal); seller’s pre-execution disclosure must deliver a current survey + encumbrance copies and advise the buyer to purchase an owner’s title policytexasTex. Prop. Code § 5.081; Tex. Prop. Code § 5.069; (encumbered-property lien disclosure) § 5.016
Marketable title owed at completion; deed/deed-tax at payoff — legal ownership conveyed by deed following satisfactory completion of the CFD (deed tax then due); vendor must convey marketable title at payoff; recorded CFD + Torrens/affidavit process clears the chain; investor-seller wrap consent/disclosure gate appliesminnesotaMinn. Dept. of Revenue, Deed Tax — Contract for Deed (conveyance/title at completion); Minn. Stat. § 559A.04 (investor-seller wrap disclosure); Minn. Stat. ch. 508 (Torrens conversion)
Marketable legal title at conversion/payoff; recorded contract gives interim priority — title delivered at full performance or at the § 10-105 40%-equity deed-for-purchase-money-mortgage conversion (which “supersede[s] entirely the land installment contract”); recorded contract + § 10-104 priority protect interim interestmarylandMd. Code, Real Prop. §§ 10-102, 10-104, 10-105
Warranty/grant deed at payoff or escrow; buyer entitled to marketable title; specific performance available — title conveyed by seller’s warranty/grant deed delivered at payoff (or held in escrow for delivery on final payment); buyer may compel conveyance by specific performance and is entitled to marketable title free of the seller’s liens at payoff; statutory anti-over-encumbrance/anti-misapplication backstopscaliforniaCal. Civ. Code §§ 1213–1215 (recording); §§ 2985.1–2985.3 (anti-over-encumbrance / misapplication)
Deliver-at-payoff or escrow; marketable title at completion; vendee interest recordable & insurable — buyer holds recordable, mortgageable equitable estate; seller must convey marketable title at payoff (intervening seller liens the chief defect risk); contract-purchaser title coverage written by state insurers; recording the contract typically a condition of coverageillinois765 ILCS 5/ (Conveyances Act — recording); Installment Sales Contract Act 765 ILCS 67/; contract recordability/insurability per state title-insurer practice
Seller holds/escrows deed delivered at payoff; marketable title at completion; equitable interest insurable — buyer entitled to marketable-title conveyance on full performance; obtain a title commitment at contracting and a final policy at payoff to catch intervening seller liens; title insurers write vendee’s-interest coverage under Ch. 627 Pt. XIIIfloridaFla. Stat. ch. 627, Part XIII (title insurance); equitable-conversion / risk-of-loss case law
Common-law default (representative; the majority position) — marketable title owed at the time set for conveyance (payoff); seller retains legal title as security meanwhile (equitable-conversion); deed delivered at payoff, escrow common but rarely mandatory; buyer protected by recording the contract + the specific-performance presumption; title insurance (vendee + owner policies) generally availablealabama · colorado · arizona · tennessee · missouri · kentucky · hawaii · new-jerseydonovan-v-bachstadt-1982 (buyer damages where seller cannot convey marketable title); friendship-manor-inc-v-greiman-1990 (specific-performance presumption); gallicchio-v-jarzla-1952, lenman-v-jones-1911 (equitable conversion); lyons-v-pitts-2006 (buyer may compel conveyance); per-state §5 modules

How the regimes compare

  • Ohio — the most prescriptive deed mandate. R.C. § 5313.02(A)(11) requires the land installment contract to contain “[a] statement requiring the vendor to deliver a general warranty deed on completion of the contract, or another deed that is available when the vendor is legally unable to deliver a general warranty deed,” and (A)(12) “[a] provision that the vendor provide evidence of title in accordance with the prevailing custom in the area in which the property is located.” The contract itself “shall conform to the formalities required by law for the execution of deeds and mortgages.” Marketability is thus a warranty matter at payoff backed by a statutory deed standard; escrow of the deed is permitted but not commanded. Source: Ohio Rev. Code § 5313.02.

  • Texas — buyer-driven conversion + mandatory title advisement. Tex. Prop. Code § 5.081 gives the purchaser the right, “at any time and without paying penalties or charges of any kind,” to “convert the purchaser’s interest in property under an executory contract into recorded, legal title”: on a full-balance tender the seller “shall transfer … recorded, legal title,” and on a conforming promissory-note tender the seller has 10 days to execute the deed (and deed of trust) or deliver a written legal justification for refusing, with § 5.079-style liability for noncompliance. The seller’s § 5.069 pre-execution disclosure must deliver a survey completed within the past year, legible copies of encumbrance documents, and a notice instructing the buyer to “OBTAIN A TITLE ABSTRACT OR TITLE COMMITMENT … AND … PURCHASE AN OWNER’S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE COVERING THE PROPERTY”; § 5.016 layers a separate lien-disclosure duty when the property is already encumbered. Sources: Tex. Prop. Code §§ 5.081, 5.069, 5.016.

  • Minnesota — title and deed tax both crystallize at completion. The Minnesota Department of Revenue confirms that “Deed Tax is due on the conveyance of legal ownership of real property with a deed following the satisfactory completion of the terms of a contract for deed” and that “[t]he deed that conveys legal ownership … from the grantor to the grantee is taxable” — i.e., legal title transfers at payoff, when the vendor must convey marketable title (the recorded CFD plus a Torrens/affidavit process under ch. 508 clears the chain). The investor-seller wrap gate of § 559A.04 governs whether a due-on-sale-mortgaged property may be sold on a CFD at all. Sources: Minn. Dept. of Revenue, Deed Tax — Contract for Deed; Minn. Stat. §§ 559A.04, ch. 508.

  • Maryland — title at payoff or at the 40%-equity conversion. Legal title is delivered at full performance or earlier via the Real Property § 10-105 deed-for-purchase-money-mortgage conversion (which “supersede[s] entirely the land installment contract”); the vendor must convey marketable legal title on completion, and the recorded contract plus § 10-104 priority protect the buyer’s interim interest. Source: Md. Code, Real Prop. §§ 10-102, 10-104, 10-105.

  • California — deed at payoff or escrow, specific performance, criminal backstops. Title is conveyed by the seller’s warranty/grant deed delivered at payoff (or held in escrow for delivery on final payment); the buyer may compel conveyance by specific performance and is entitled at payoff to marketable title free of the seller’s liens. Recording (Civ. Code §§ 1213–1215) protects the buyer’s interim interest, and Civ. Code §§ 2985.1–2985.3 restrict the fee owner from separately transferring/encumbering the property and from misapplying the buyer’s payments. Sources: Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1213–1215, 2985.1–2985.3.

  • The majority — common-law default. Most jurisdictions impose no CFD-specific deed statute. Under equitable conversion the buyer is the beneficial owner from contracting and the seller holds legal title as security (gallicchio-v-jarzla-1952, lenman-v-jones-1911); the seller’s marketable- title duty matures at the time set for conveyance (payoff). The buyer’s protections are recording the contract/memorandum (constructive notice and priority, friendship-manor-inc-v-greiman-1990), the specific-performance presumption for breach of the duty to convey (id.; lyons-v-pitts-2006), and benefit-of-the-bargain damages where the seller cannot deliver marketable title (donovan-v-bachstadt-1982). Title insurance — a vendee’s-interest policy during the term and an owner’s policy at payoff — is generally available. Operators should still record, escrow the deed, keep title clean, and run a payoff-date commitment, because the absence of a statute is not the absence of a duty. Sources: the cited cases; each state’s §5 module.

Primary sources (retrieved 2026-06-08)

  • Ohio Rev. Code § 5313.02(A)(11), (A)(12) — land installment contract must require the vendor to “deliver a general warranty deed on completion of the contract, or another deed that is available when the vendor is legally unable to deliver a general warranty deed,” and to “provide evidence of title in accordance with the prevailing custom in the area in which the property is located”; the contract “shall conform to the formalities required by law for the execution of deeds and mortgages.” https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-revised-code/section-5313.02
  • Tex. Prop. Code § 5.081 — purchaser may “at any time and without paying penalties or charges of any kind … convert the purchaser’s interest … into recorded, legal title”; seller “shall transfer … recorded, legal title” on full-balance tender, or on a conforming note tender execute the deed within 10 days or deliver a written legal justification for refusal; § 5.079-style liability for violation. https://texas.public.law/statutes/tex._prop._code_section_5.081
  • Tex. Prop. Code § 5.069 — seller’s pre-execution disclosure must include a survey completed within the past year, legible copies of encumbrance documents, and a notice advising the buyer to “OBTAIN A TITLE ABSTRACT OR TITLE COMMITMENT … AND … PURCHASE AN OWNER’S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE COVERING THE PROPERTY.” https://texas.public.law/statutes/tex._prop._code_section_5.069
  • Tex. Prop. Code § 5.016 — conveyance of residential property encumbered by a lien requires a separate ≥12-point written disclosure (lienholder name/address/phone, debt secured by each lien, terms, consent status, insurance, taxes due, top-of-page lien warning) “on or before the seventh day before the earlier of the effective date of the conveyance or the execution of an executory contract.” https://texas.public.law/statutes/tex._prop._code_section_5.016
  • Minnesota Department of Revenue — Deed Tax / Contract for Deed — “Deed Tax is due on the conveyance of legal ownership of real property with a deed following the satisfactory completion of the terms of a contract for deed”; the deed conveying legal ownership “from the grantor to the grantee is taxable” — confirming legal title transfers at payoff. https://www.revenue.state.mn.us/deed-tax-contract-deed
  • Minn. Stat. § 559A.04 — investor-seller wrap gate (binding lienholder consent / non-enforcement agreement + contract disclosure before selling a due-on-sale-mortgaged property on a CFD). https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/559A.04
  • donovan-v-bachstadt-1982Donovan v. Bachstadt, 91 N.J. 434, 453 A.2d 160 (1982): where the seller could not convey marketable title because of a title defect, the buyer recovers benefit-of-the-bargain (compensatory) damages, not merely a deposit refund. (Verified case page in repo; opinion source on file.)
  • friendship-manor-inc-v-greiman-1990 — 244 N.J. Super. 104, 581 A.2d 893 (App. Div. 1990): “virtual presumption … that specific performance is the buyer’s remedy for the vendor’s breach of a contract to convey”; constructive notice governs priority. (Verified case page in repo.)
  • lyons-v-pitts-2006 — 40,733 (La. App. 2 Cir. 3/8/06), 923 So. 2d 962: a bond-for-deed buyer may sue for specific performance to compel conveyance of title on payment of the price. (Verified case page in repo.)
  • lenman-v-jones-1911 — 222 U.S. 51 (1911): a land-contract vendee (and the vendee’s assignee) becomes the equitable owner and may compel specific performance of the conveyance. (Verified case page in repo.)
  • gallicchio-v-jarzla-1952 — 18 N.J. Super. 206, 86 A.2d 820 (App. Div. 1952): under equitable conversion the vendee is the equitable owner and the vendor holds legal title “as trustee/security.” (Verified case page in repo.)

Meta

  • needs_verification:
    • Each state’s articulable “marketable title” standard / Marketable Title Act interplay. Most states define marketability through case law (no-reasonable-doubt / not-exposed-to-litigation), and many have a Marketable Record Title Act (e.g., the Uniform Marketable Title Act and state analogs in FL, OH, MI, MN, IL, IN, NE, ND, SD, WY, CT, OK, RI, others) that extinguishes stale interests after a root-of-title period. The specific section and root-of-title period for each jurisdiction was not retrieved verbatim this run and should be confirmed before relying on a particular curative period.
    • Maryland §§ 10-102 / 10-104 / 10-105 exact text — harvested from the maryland jurisdiction page (which flags insurer practice in its own needs_verification) but not re-retrieved verbatim this run; confirm the § 10-105 40%-equity conversion language and the recording-priority sections against the official Md. Code before advising.
    • Illinois — the 765 ILCS 5/ (Conveyances Act) recording sections and the 765 ILCS 67/ Installment Sales Contract Act content/recording duties are documented on the illinois page; the exact recording-priority pin cite and whether marketability is addressed by case law (rather than the consumer-protection statutes) were not re-retrieved verbatim this run. (Ruva v. Mente, 143 Ill. 2d 257 (1991), is real but concerns the Dwelling Unit Installment Contract Act’s warranty/certificate-of-compliance requirement, not recording or marketable title — it was removed from the Illinois map row as non-supporting.) Florida ch. 627 Part XIII title-insurance provisions are sourced on the florida page but the vendee-coverage mechanics were not re-retrieved this run.
    • California §§ 1213–1215 and 2985.1 (affirmative CFD/AITD disclosure form) — §§ 2985.2–2985.3 are confirmed on the wrap-around-mortgage page; the recording sections and the affirmative § 2985.1/AITD disclosure mechanics were not retrieved verbatim this run.
    • Whether a vendee’s-interest (contract-purchaser) title policy is actually written by admitted insurers in each named state, and on what underwriting conditions — stated generally (IL/OH/FL/CA/MN/TX) from jurisdiction pages and industry practice, but insurer practice is not a primary legal source and varies by underwriter; confirm with the specific title company before relying on availability.
    • The remaining ~48 jurisdictions’ deed-delivery / marketable-title specifics — placed in the common-law-default row by representative example; each warrants its own retrieved statute or case to be classified as “statutory deed mandate” vs. “common-law default” on later passes.
  • open_questions:
    • When the seller dies, divorces, or files bankruptcy mid-term, does an escrowed deed reliably defeat the estate/trustee/spousal claim in each state, or can the deed be pulled back as an incomplete delivery / avoidable transfer? Normalize the deed-escrow enforceability rule per state (§7 Bankruptcy & Death/Divorce modules).
    • Does recording the contract/memorandum alone give the buyer priority sufficient to take free of a seller lien that attaches afterward, or only constructive notice that must still be litigated? Race vs. race-notice vs. notice regimes diverge; map per state.
    • What is the buyer’s practical remedy ladder when marketable title fails at payoff — specific performance with price abatement, rescission + return of payments, damages (donovan-v-bachstadt-1982), or equitable subrogation to a paid-off senior lien? Normalize on each state page.
  • cross_links: equitable-conversion · equitable-title · wrap-around-mortgage · underlying-mortgage-wrap · quiet-title-after-cancellation · statutory-cancellation · garn-st-germain-due-on-sale · texas · ohio · minnesota · maryland · california · illinois · florida · new-jersey · hawaii · donovan-v-bachstadt-1982 · friendship-manor-inc-v-greiman-1990 · lyons-v-pitts-2006 · lenman-v-jones-1911 · gallicchio-v-jarzla-1952
  • changelog:
    • 2026-06-08 — Page created. Defined marketable title and the CFD-specific rule that the seller’s duty is deferred to payoff/deed-delivery under equitable conversion; covered deed delivery + escrow, curing seller title defects, and title-insurance availability (vendee’s-interest at contracting; owner’s policy at payoff). Built the jurisdiction map distinguishing statutory deed mandates (Ohio § 5313.02(A)(11)–(12)), buyer-conversion + title-advisement regimes (Texas §§ 5.081, 5.069, 5.016), title/deed-at-completion (Minnesota Dept. of Revenue + ch. 508), the Maryland § 10-105 conversion, California’s escrow/specific-performance/anti-over-encumbrance regime, Illinois/Florida insurable-vendee-interest practice, and the common-law default. Primary sources retrieved this run: Ohio R.C. § 5313.02; Tex. Prop. Code §§ 5.081, 5.069, 5.016; Minn. Dept. of Revenue Deed-Tax/Contract-for-Deed; Minn. Stat. § 559A.04. Linked verified in-repo cases (Donovan v. Bachstadt, Friendship Manor v. Greiman, Lyons v. Pitts, Lenman v. Jones, Gallicchio v. Jarzla). Flagged state Marketable Title Acts, Maryland/Illinois/Florida/California pin cites, and per-state vendee-policy practice under needs_verification.

Disclaimer. This page is legal information, not legal advice, and may be out of date. Title, marketability, deed-delivery, escrow, and curative law are governed by each state’s statutes, recording acts, and case law and turn on the specific terms of the contract and the state of the seller’s record title. Confirm the current statute and that any cited authority is still good law before structuring, selling, or buying on a contract for deed, and consult a licensed real-estate attorney and a title company in the relevant jurisdiction.